<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>TAR on LegalRealist AI</title><link>https://legalrealist.ai/tags/tar/</link><description>Recent content in TAR on LegalRealist AI</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>hi@legalrealist.ai (LegalRealist AI)</managingEditor><webMaster>hi@legalrealist.ai (LegalRealist AI)</webMaster><copyright>© 2026 LegalRealist AI</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://legalrealist.ai/tags/tar/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>eDiscovery Economics: What Your Law Firm's AI Pitch Is Actually Selling</title><link>https://legalrealist.ai/posts/33-ai-edisco-cost/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>hi@legalrealist.ai (LegalRealist AI)</author><guid>https://legalrealist.ai/posts/33-ai-edisco-cost/</guid><description>AI processing costs ~3% of an AI-enhanced eDiscovery workflow. The real savings come from restructuring leverage — shifting volume QC from $750/hr associates to $50/hr contract attorneys. Here&amp;rsquo;s the math.</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://legalrealist.ai/posts/33-ai-edisco-cost/feature.png"/></item></channel></rss>