<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Concord-Music on LegalRealist AI</title><link>https://legalrealist.ai/tags/concord-music/</link><description>Recent content in Concord-Music on LegalRealist AI</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>hi@legalrealist.ai (LegalRealist AI)</managingEditor><webMaster>hi@legalrealist.ai (LegalRealist AI)</webMaster><copyright>© 2026 LegalRealist AI</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://legalrealist.ai/tags/concord-music/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Privilege, Work Product, and AI: A 2026 Doctrinal Map</title><link>https://legalrealist.ai/posts/12-ai-prompts-privilege-map/</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>hi@legalrealist.ai (LegalRealist AI)</author><guid>https://legalrealist.ai/posts/12-ai-prompts-privilege-map/</guid><description>Federal courts are working out how attorney-client privilege and work product apply to AI prompts. The doctrine hasn&amp;rsquo;t changed — &lt;em&gt;Hickman&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Upjohn&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Kovel&lt;/em&gt; still control. Here&amp;rsquo;s how each case applies the existing elements.</description></item></channel></rss>